Dear Editor,
In the run-up to elections, we often hear statements like, “No matter who’s elected, I still have to work,” “I don’t really like any of the parties, so what’s the point?” and “What’s the point of voting?” I think these are honest remarks, but ones that also pinpoint precisely why we need to reconsider just what “the point” of voting really is.
I would like to debunk that train of thought and shed light on the reasons why voting is so important. As much as one may be frustrated with politics, voting remains the most effective way of influencing decisions that affect us on a daily basis. These decisions span taxation, wages, education, healthcare, jobs, and infrastructure. With more individuals voting, democracy is strengthened and leaders cannot help but reflect the diversity of the population. This helps to ensure that policies represent the priorities and needs of the community. The opposite occurs when there is low voter turnout, where a loud minority is able to impose decisions that are unwanted by the silent majority. Voting moves us toward a more just and equal society, as politicians listen to voters who turn out, and where turnout is more extensive, responsiveness increases.
So how do voters decide? The secret is to cut through the noise. Read party manifestos rather than shiny flyers or social media hashtags. Select three or four things that matter most to you, such as jobs, education, roads, healthcare, or fighting corruption, and compare parties based on your priorities.
Others say, “My one vote won’t make any difference.” History has shown that every vote does matter. Some claim, “All politicians are alike.” That is not true. Platforms differ on taxes, wages, security, housing, and social services. Voting is the way we give credit for good performance, send clear messages of expectation, and hold leaders accountable. For those feeling uninformed, the solution is simple: take note of issues important to you and research which choice best reflects those priorities.
What about those who are not excited about any of the options? That’s a reasonable feeling, but not voting is not a protest against the system. It merely gives greater weight to the votes of those who do turn out. Politicians have been proven to serve the groups that most consistently vote. Policies will be crafted to please them, not the silent majority/minority, if they are only designed with the input of a segment of the public.
Even if no party appears to be “your party,” there are still practical ways to make your vote count. One is to vote for accountability and transparency by casting a ballot for candidates or parties that commit to specific measures of the same. Another is to vote on issues, not personalities. Read manifestos carefully on matters that affect your family, such as taxation, transport, education, electricity, health, and apprenticeships, or whatever you consider important, and vote for the party with the most realistic proposal. Tactical voting is also an option if choices seem mediocre, allowing you to help prevent outcomes you find most objectionable. By casting votes in this way, citizens can make valid, informed decisions even when no party fully reflects their ideals.
Some say, “I will need to go to work tomorrow regardless, so voting will not make any difference to my life.” But it does. Elections affect the taxes we pay, the subsidies we receive, the apprenticeships and jobs available, and how our oil wealth is invested. Decisions by leaders have a direct effect on working people’s pay and prospects.
Finally, not voting is not a neutral act. By abstaining, you are effectively leaving your influence to others. By voting, even tactically or with reservations, you safeguard your own interests and contribute to a better democracy for everyone.