Dear Editor,
It was the mother of all contradictions. The ruling by the apex judge in our local judiciary which clearly contradicts that of a sitting judge on identical GRA/PCAU matters. Technically it is a win for GRA but cannot so be declared in the dominant matter in the public domain, pending appeal. What does this mean for the judge?
Still on the matter: scrolling through the headlines of the online editions of the two independent dailies, the landmark ruling by the apex judge, which contradicts that of the judge, was noticeably not given front page prominence in either newspaper. Was the ruling not newsworthy enough?