Dear Editor,
I fully commend Dr. Randy Persaud in his effort to educate the nation on what the Orange Economy is. As it is in its conceptual stage, I think it would be prudent to add some valuable insights that would see us moving away from the current disconnected, piece-meal and the usual ad-hoc manner of implementing new policy agendas, instead pursuing such lofty goals in a more holistic, constructive and meaningful way.
Editor, let’s applaud the Government of Guyana’s commitment to the Orange Economy (OE)—a globally significant, ideas-based sector leveraging creativity, culture, and intellectual property (IP)—as a strategic pillar for economic diversification. The promise of the new Guyana Development Bank and projects like the Palmyra Stadium and the 63 Beach cabins signals a serious intent to build an economy that is less reliant on extractive industries.
However, the current method of introducing this transformative policy—through conceptual outlines and project announcements—runs a significant risk of policy failure or a stunted takeoff. The OE, by its very nature, is people-centered and labour-intensive, relying not on physical resources, but on the intellectual and cultural assets of our citizens. To launch this innovation without the necessary foundational steps is akin to building a beautiful structure without securing the land title.
For an economy grounded in culture and creativity to thrive, the “invisible infrastructure” that protects and empowers its creators must be built first.
The Absence of a White Paper and Education: The first step for such a transformative policy must be a comprehensive White Paper. This document is essential not just for the government, but for the public education of the beneficiaries. It must clearly define the OE’s scope, measurable targets, and the pathways for citizens—especially young people and those in the hinterland—to access opportunities and financing. Without this blueprint, the policy remains an exciting but nebulous concept.
Lack of Widespread Public Consultation: Because the OE deals directly with cultural heritage and community assets, it demands widespread, inclusive public consultation. Policy should not be dictated but co-created. Failure to involve artists, cultural workers, youth groups, and regional stakeholders from the outset will lead to skepticism and a lack of buy-in, undermining the policy’s potential for regional integration and inclusiveness.
The IP and Legal Vacuum: The OE’s economic value is derived from Intellectual Property (IP)—copyrights, trademarks, and design rights. To ask creators to invest their time and ideas without a guarantee of robust legal protection and enforcement mechanisms is a critical flaw. Before projects are launched, the government must commit to reviewing and strengthening its IP laws. Specialized legal frameworks, simplified business registration, and tailored financing models must be established to ensure creators can monetize their work without fear of piracy or bureaucratic hurdles.
The Orange Economy is an excellent and necessary strategic fit for Guyana. It provides a strategic mechanism for economic resilience and inclusive growth. We urge the administration to prioritize the creation of a formal, consultative, and legally sound framework. This commitment to transparent policy development—starting with a White Paper and legislative protections—will provide the necessary trust and stability to turn the Orange Economy from an abstract concept into a successful national reality. With the ultimate objective of not only creating another income stream but forging a pathway to securing generational wealth.