Conclusion: More Suspicious than Ambitious

Dear Editor,

To the Taxpayers (The Benefactors) & the Citizens (The Beneficiaries):

The nation stand at the crossroads. The government has unveiled a housing “vision” so massive it threatens to eclipse our national budget and overwhelm our common sense. While we are told to applaud the “bold intuition” of our leaders, the math tells a story not of ambition, but of a calculated, predictable purging of the public purse.

1. The Impossible Arithmetic of “Success”

The administration—led by the Vice President’s declarations and the Minister’s social media addresses—has set a target of 40,000 homes over 5 years. That is 8,000 homes annually, or 22 houses delivered every single day, blatant-tomfoolery.

The Reality Check:

• Logistical Haste: Building 22 houses a day in a country with two rainy seasons and a documented technical labour shortage is not “ambitious”—it is a recipe for structural failure.
• The Inspection Gap: To ensure value for money, we would need an army of independent inspectors. Without them, “quality assurance” is sacrificed to meet political quotas, leaving the beneficiary with defective buildings, while the contractor walks away with the profit. It’s not only about implementation, but technical and regulatory oversight.
• The Contractor Load: Splitting 8,000 annual units among ~260 “pre-qualified” contractors mean each must deliver 30 units a year perfectly. With some aspects being time-constrained and in a market where sand, cement, and skilled labor are already scarce, this will trigger scarcity-driven inflation, making the “affordable” home a debt-trap for the poor.

2. Deconstructing the $800 Billion Price Tag

The Vice President has stated that it costs roughly $5 million GYD just to prepare a single house lot (roads, drains, light, water) before a brick is laid. When we aggregate the infrastructure and the build-out across the projected 5-year cycle, we are looking at a total investment nearing $800 Billion GYD.

Where is the Money Actually Going?

• Official Target: 40,000 Homes in 5 Years (8,000 per year).
• Infrastructure Cost (Per VP): $5 Million per parcel ($200 Billion total for 40k lots).
• Construction Estimate: $10M – $15M per unit. Questionable in the absence of designs and Bill of Quantities
• The “Larceny” Margin: When a vision is pushed without transparent financial feasibility or technical surveys, the gap between the “stated cost” and the “actual value” becomes a bottom—less pit for public funds. This is a “wealth transfer” masquerading as a welfare program.

III. A Call to the Parliamentary Opposition (The PAC-in-Waiting)

To the Opposition in waiting: Your work begins now, in absentia. You will eventually chair the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), and the audit trail for this $800 Billion must start today.

We call on you to demand the immediate release of:

1. Technical Surveys: Where is the soil testing and environmental impact data for these 40,000 sites?
2. Procurement Transparency: How were 264 contractors “pre-qualified” without public tenders that reflect true market competition?
3. Inflation Protections: What is the plan to prevent state-led spending from pricing the average private builder-homeowner out of the market?

Do not wait for the Auditor General’s report three years from now to tell us the money is gone. The “predictable purge” is happening in real-time.

Conclusion: More Suspicious than Ambitious

We cannot allow a “Grand Vision” to become a “Grand Larceny.” When the government avoids sound technical research and proffers data that defies the laws of physics and economics, it is no longer a housing drive—it is an expose in progress.

Taxpayers, wake up. The alarm is sounding. Let’s stop the foundation of our future from being built on the quicksand of corruption.