Dear Editor,
The government’s recent strides in digitizing Guyana, most notably the launch of the AI-supported Guyana Digital School, position our nation as a regional leader in technological adoption. However, as someone who has worked in this field for well over a decade, I must caution that hardware and access are only half the battle.
If we do not pivot our pedagogical approach, we risk falling into a trap identified by the 2025 UNDP Human Development Report, which warns of a “Next Great Divergence” where AI, if unmanaged, widens the gap in human capabilities and erodes the cognitive gains of the last century.
We must recognize that the wealth of our nation is ultimately found in the cognitive capacity of the people, not just in its natural resources.
The stakes are quantified in recent global research that should give us pause. Evidence across more than 80 countries shows a consistent pattern: students with higher daily computer use in classrooms actually perform worse in reading, mathematics, and science.
Neuroscientist Dr. Jared Cooney Horvath has testified before the U.S. Senate that we are witnessing a “measurable reversal in cognitive development” across the developed world. He argues that foundational skills required for deep learning are weakening because digital environments are designed for constant task switching and fragmented focus, which systematically undertrains sustained attention and complex reasoning.
UNESCO’s 2025 report similarly highlights the threat of “cognitive dispossession,” where the human capacity for independent thought is outsourced to algorithms.
To navigate this, our curriculum must move beyond mere “prompt engineering” and ground itself in the principles of critical pedagogy established by Paulo Freire and furthered by Henry Giroux. Freire famously argued that education must involve “reading the world,” not just “reading the word.” In an AI-saturated environment, this means students should not use technology to passively consume pre-packaged answers, but to decode the social and political realities the technology represents.
Critical thinking is not the ability to find a solution quickly; it is the capacity for “epistemic vigilance”, the active interrogation of how knowledge is produced and whose interests it serves.
Fostering this level of intelligence requires what Giroux describes as a “pedagogy of hope” that treats students as critical agents rather than empty vessels to be filled by digital data. AI can enhance this process by acting as a “Socratic interlocutor” that challenges a student’s assumptions, but only if the learner has the cognitive endurance to engage in that struggle. If our schools are optimized for device use and engagement metrics rather than how human cognition actually develops, the consequences, a decline in memory formation and comprehension will be irreversible.
With its abundant resources and visionary leadership, Guyana has a unique opportunity to make use of the current digitalization trends. We can buy the latest software, but we cannot buy back the lost cognitive potential of a generation that has been conditioned for shallow processing.
It is imperative that the Ministry of Education retains educational professionals in AI-education integration to ensure our digital transformation acts as a catalyst for the Guyanese mind.