Dear Editor,
Vishnu Bisram’s recent defense of Guyana’s $224 million GYD annual lobbying bill (Feb 22) is a masterclass in the very “colonial mindset” that continues to tether our national identity to the coattails of Washington. By invoking the ghosts of 1977 and the struggles of the Cold War, Bisram attempts to justify a modern-day political luxury tax through the lens of antiquated nostalgia. His argument suggests that Guyana is a state so fragile that it must pay a subscription fee to the United States simply to ensure its own survival. This is not diplomacy; it is a surrender of agency.
The geopolitical landscape of 2026 bears no resemblance to the era of Bisram’s “tertiary education.” To suggest that we must pay millions to firms like Continental Strategy to “shield” us from Venezuela is to ignore the glaring reality that the U.S. military is already anchored in our waters to protect its own energy security and the interests of its oil giants. We are effectively paying for a “protection” that Washington provides for free to safeguard its own economy. Bisram confuses a “warm relationship” with a “paid subservience,” failing to realize that a sovereign nation should be respected for its economic output and governance, not for its ability to cut checks to K-Street lobbyists.
Furthermore, Bisram conveniently ignores the distinction between national interest and partisan survival. When taxpayer dollars are funneled to firms with direct lines to the White House to frame domestic narratives and target local commercial rivals, we are no longer lobbying for Guyana; we are subsidizing the political insurance of a ruling elite. This $224 million does not lower the cost of living for the Guyanese worker or bridge our infrastructure gaps; it merely buys a “crisis management” shield for the government.
It is time to move past the 1970s fear-mongering that Bisram relies upon. To argue that we must choose between “left-wing dictatorship” and paying millions for American approval is a false dichotomy that insults the intelligence of the modern Guyanese citizen. Real sovereignty is not bought in the hallways of D.C.; it is built at home through transparency, independent institutions, and the courage to exist without asking for permission. If the “return on investment” for our millions only manifests in Washington photo-ops while the average citizen struggles, then we aren’t buying democracy—we are buying a very expensive illusion of it.