Dear Editor,
The new world order coalition in resistance to U.S. dominance crumbles under the current global state of affairs. The coalition of anti-American nations (Venezuela, Iran, Russia, North Korea, and China) is being dismantled one by one. Everyone remembers their show of solidarity prior to the pandemic that originated from China[1] and their subsequent show of military strength. Since then, Venezuela, which was the closest in location to the U.S. and the most vociferous and oil rich threat has been neutralised with the decapitation of its head and most active member Nicolas Maduro. Someone who has been linked to the narcotics used to weaken the U.S. from the inside by creating a drug addicted and less focused citizenry. His invitation to allow Russian military marine vessels in waters close to the U.S. was a major misstep that provoked the wrath of the most powerful military in the world. Cuba did join Venezuela in this miscalculation and now the wrath of the U.S. is also upon them.
Securing the communist island in America’s best interest is now at hand and about to be achieved without military action. Russia has not come to their rescue nor has China, even though they had a high-level meeting just prior to Maduro’s capture. Maduro’s replacement has shown herself to be quite docile and easily redirected to the will of the U.S. Personal survival has trumped party and Chavez’s interests. Will Venezuelan national interests also shift to the will of the U.S.?
Russia continues to be occupied with its own search for additional resources that has left their military weakened and their economy poorer as a result. Iran has been shown to be more rhetoric than action in the face of American military might and has been forced to reduce the scope of their military operations in the region. The supreme leader of the Islamic Republic has suffered a worse faith than that of Maduro who still lives. As oil prices soar due to the restrictions caused by the war in the Middle East, China has been forced to reduce its forecast for economic growth, and they have also been very reluctant to give the members of their new world order coalition any military assistance. The fire horse of the East has galloped off into the sunset of self-interest and remains very focused within its Great Wall on continually securing its territory. Will the moment of confrontation over Taiwan occur if U.S. victory and strength can be gained without it?
The actions of the U.S. in the Middle East may prove to be a master stroke that will weaken China and add additional strength to the U.S. economy over the long term via increased oil reserves and resulting cheaper energy to drive American economic growth. An unconditional surrender by Iran will surely provide the correct foundation for such an expectation. The last member of the anti-American coalition, North Korea, has been engulfed in Russia’s misstep in Ukraine while the U.S. cautiously provides new strength to Japan. Many may not like Trump’s approach of speed & surprise over gaining permission, but in the game of long-term strategy that involves war few will be able to find a better solution to secure America’s place in the world.
The increased focus on reducing narcotic and human trafficking activities via the launch of the Shield of the Americas Summit[2] provides a broad and powerful platform for the U.S. to further secure its citizens from external threats. A plus for continual American prosperity. This may prove to be yet another master stroke that will help return the region to one of peace and security. Guyana cannot afford to be on the wrong side of history in this moment. This does not mean acting as a colony of the U.S. as our current president has shown a propensity towards but instead it means that it is time to profoundly embrace a strong law and order system that supports the sustainable prosperity of all within our hemisphere regardless of the religious, political, and economic ideology of our current government. President Trump’s overall strategy deserves an A+ at this time. The U.S. has produced a strong trump card that has won the current hand on the table in the game of global dominance.
Best regards,
Mr. Jamil Changlee
Chairman
The Cooperative Republicans of Guyana
Mr. Jamil Changlee
Chairman
The Cooperative Republicans of Guyana
References
- Unclassified Summary of Assessment on COVID-19 Origins — www.dni.gov ↩
- Shield of the Americas - Wikipedia — en.wikipedia.org ↩
Other references
assesses that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, probably emerged and infected humans through an initial small-scale exposure that occurred no later than November 2019 with the first known cluster of COVID-19 cases arising in Wuhan, China in December 2019. In addition, the IC was able to reach broad agreement on several other key issues. We judge the virus was not developed as a biological weapon. Most agencies also assess with low confidence that SARS-CoV-2 probably was not genetically engineered; however, two agencies believe there was not sufficient evidence to make an assessment either way. Finally, the IC assesses China’s officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initial outbreak of
COVID-19 emerged. After examining all available intelligence reporting and other information, though, the IC remains divided on the most likely origin of COVID-19. All agencies assess that two hypotheses are plausible: natural exposure to an infected animal and a laboratory-associated incident. Four IC elements and the National Intelligence Council assess with low confidence that the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection was most likely caused by natural exposure to an animal infected with it or a close progenitor virus—a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2. These analysts give weight to China’s officials’ lack of foreknowledge, the numerous vectors for natural exposure, and other
factors. One IC element assesses with moderate confidence that the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was the result of a laboratory-associated incident, probably involving experimentation, animal handling, or sampling by the Wuhan Institute of ... Analysts at three IC elements remain unable to coalesce around either explanation ... Variations in analytic views largely stem from differences in how agencies weigh intelligence reporting and scientific publications, and intelligence and scientific gaps. The IC judges they will be unable to provide a more definitive explanation for the origin of COVID-19 unless new information allows them to determine the specific pathway for initial natural contact with an animal or to determine that a laboratory in Wuhan was handling SARSCoV-2 or a close progenitor ... UNCLASSIFIED
2
UNCLASSIFIED
The IC—and the global scientific community—lacks clinical samples or a complete understanding of epidemiological data from the earliest COVID-19 cases. If we obtain information on the earliest cases that identified a location of interest or occupational exposure, it may alter our evaluation of hypotheses. China’s cooperation most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19. Beijing, however, continues to hinder the global investigation, resist sharing information and blame other countries, including the United States. These actions reflect, in part, China’s government’s own uncertainty about where an investigation could lead as well as its frustration the international community is using the issue to exert political pressure on China.
Source
- The U.S. continues to show dominance in Kaieteur News, March 8, 2026