Dear Editor,
Following the recent BBC World Questions forum held in Guyana, much of the discussion focused on contemporary criticisms surrounding poverty, job quality, and governance.
These are legitimate topics for debate. However, the conversation illustrated a recurring problem in international discourse about developing countries: issues are often discussed without establishing the historical and economic context necessary to properly understand them.
Guyana’s development story cannot be interpreted through isolated statistics or present-day political commentary alone. To understand where the country stands today, one must first understand the long and difficult economic journey that preceded it.
Guyana marks 60 years of independence in 2026, making it one of the youngest sovereign nations in the Western Hemisphere. Yet for much of that time, the country struggled with deep economic crises.
By the late 1980s, Guyana’s sovereign debt had reached nearly 900% of GDP, debt service obligations exceeded 150% of government revenue, and inflation surged into triple digits. Poverty engulfed roughly 90% of the population.
The early 1990s marked a turning point. Through structural reforms, debt relief, and fiscal discipline, Guyana gradually restored macroeconomic stability.
Today, Guyana stands at a new juncture. Public debt has fallen to below 25% of GDP, debt service is under 10% of government revenue, and international reserves exceed external debt by more than twice.
Understanding Guyana’s development therefore requires viewing the present moment within the broader arc of the country’s history: from economic collapse, to recovery, to periods of political stagnation, and now to a phase of structural transformation.
International discussions about Guyana are important, but they must be grounded in evidence and context. Without that foundation, narratives risk becoming distorted and the true complexity of Guyana’s economic journey is easily overlooked.