Dear Editor,
Stabroek News reported in September 2011 that a leaked United States diplomatic cable described the links between convicted drug trafficker Roger Khan and then Health Minister Dr Leslie Ramsammy as “strong.”[1] The cable reportedly stated that Khan had proposed Ramsammy as an intermediary with the US Government and recorded the Embassy’s concern about the Guyana Government’s “high tolerance for official corruption.” Ramsammy repeatedly denied any relationship with Khan.
Whether every allegation was ultimately proved is not the only issue. The episode confirms that foreign missions were aware of serious allegations concerning connections between organized crime and persons associated with the Guyanese State. Yet Khan, who claimed that he had helped the government combat crime, was never prosecuted in Guyana for the criminal network and violence attributed to him. No comprehensive and credible local investigation has publicly established the full truth.
This history makes the intensity of the State’s campaign against Opposition Leader Azruddin Mohamed and the WIN movement impossible to ignore. Over roughly two years, Mohamed has faced tax proceedings, attempted vehicle seizures, the surrender and seizure of firearms, police investigations, searches, arrests and extradition proceedings. Commercial banks also closed accounts belonging to Mohamed and several WIN members, reportedly because of perceived risks arising from United States sanctions.
Mohamed must answer any properly supported allegation through an independent judicial process. Political office cannot confer immunity. However, due process also means that investigations must not be manufactured, selectively pursued or coordinated to cripple a political opponent. The Government denies political interference and maintains that the extradition proceedings arise from a lawful US request. That position does not eliminate the public’s right to question the timing, scale and cumulative effect of these actions.
Guyana has seen this pattern before. Under Forbes Burnham, police and other state institutions were used against persons and organizations considered threats to the government’s hold on power. Walter Rodney and other WPA members were arrested, harassed and placed under surveillance. The Walter Rodney Commission of Inquiry later concluded that state agencies were implicated in Rodney’s assassination and that Burnham knew of the plot.[2]
The parallel should disturb every Guyanese, regardless of party affiliation. When the police, revenue authority and other institutions appear intensely mobilized against the principal political challenger while longstanding allegations involving politically connected figures remain unresolved, selective justice becomes a reasonable public concern.
Guyana cannot condemn Burnham-era authoritarianism while reproducing its methods under a different party banner. State institutions belong to the people, not to the PPP, the PNC or any political executive. Their officers must be appointed and promoted for competence, independence and integrity, never for their willingness to serve political power brokers.
The Government’s priorities appear misplaced, and Guyanese are taking notice. If even half the energy directed against Mohamed and WIN had been devoted to investigating Roger Khan’s alleged network and its connections to public officials, Guyana might already known far more about one of the darkest periods in its recent history. Many people would still be alive today too perhaps.