Dear Editor,
There is a difference between holding a government accountable and attempting to discredit an entire political movement by selectively presenting history.
Hadiyyah Mohamed’s article, “Jagdeo’s Political Desperation and the PPP’s Fear of a Changing Guyana,” makes sweeping assertions about Vice-president, Dr Bharrat Jagdeo and the PPP/C.[1] Yet, in its determination to predict their political demise, it gives insufficient weight to the economic, social and infrastructural transformation Guyana has experienced over the past three decades.
Guyana deserves political debate grounded in facts, historical context and a fair assessment of the national record.
Let me state my position clearly: I support the development agenda of the People’s Progressive Party/Civic, and I believe that Dr Bharrat Jagdeo’s contribution to Guyana’s development deserves serious recognition.
This support is not a claim that any government is beyond criticism. It is a recognition that leadership must be assessed in the context of what a country inherited, what it achieved and what it is working to accomplish.
The attempt to portray Jagdeo as a politician whose legacy has been shattered does not adequately account for the Guyana that existed when the PPP/C returned to office in 1992, the reforms and investments that followed, or the extraordinary development opportunities that Guyana now possesses.
Here are a few schooling topics with broad headings to simplify the context for you. They are as follows:
The journey from HIPC to a country with global economic significance
Perhaps the most important omission in the article is the historical and economic context of Guyana’s transformation.
When the PPP/C returned to office in 1992, Guyana faced severe economic constraints, a heavy external debt burden, limited fiscal room and substantial deficiencies in infrastructure and public services.
The country had endured years of economic contraction and had struggled to meet its international financial obligations.
Guyana subsequently participated in the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries initiative, commonly known as HIPC, through which it received substantial international debt relief.
The International Monetary Fund and World Bank documented approximately US$256.4 million in net-present-value debt relief under the original HIPC framework and a further US$334.5 million under the enhanced framework.[2]
These arrangements were linked to economic reforms, poverty-reduction measures and efforts to strengthen public services.
Those figures are not campaign slogans. They are part of Guyana’s documented economic history.
Debt relief did not happen in isolation, and it would be inaccurate to attribute every improvement to one party or one individual. Earlier economic reforms, international partnerships, domestic policy decisions and the contributions of Guyanese workers and businesses all formed part of the process.
Nevertheless, successive PPP/C administrations played an important role in managing the recovery, securing debt relief and directing resources toward national development.
In 2016, the World Bank reclassified Guyana from a lower-middle-income economy to an upper-middle-income economy.[3] Following the emergence of commercial oil production in late 2019, the country’s economic trajectory changed dramatically, and Guyana subsequently attained high-income classification under the World Bank’s income criteria in 2023.
The distinction matters: HIPC was a debt-relief initiative, not an income classification. Guyana’s graduation from the HIPC process and its later rise in income classification were separate milestones in a much longer economic journey.
Oil has accelerated the transformation, but the foundations of modern Guyana were not laid overnight. The country’s economic recovery, institutional reforms, infrastructure investments and development planning predate first oil.
The honest question is not whether Guyana has reached perfection. It has not. The question is whether the country has advanced considerably from the circumstances it faced three decades ago. The historical and economic evidence makes that case compelling.
Dr Bharrat Jagdeo and the importance of long-term vision
During his presidency from 1999 to 2011, Dr. Jagdeo presided over a period in which Guyana pursued economic modernization, infrastructure development, social investment and international environmental leadership.
His administration advanced the Low Carbon Development Strategy in 2009, an initiative that sought to demonstrate that a country could pursue economic development while preserving its forests and earning international support for their environmental value.[4]
The United Nations Environment Programme subsequently recognized Jagdeo as a Champion of the Earth for his policy leadership on environmental issues.[5]
The Guyana-Norway partnership that emerged from this approach generated payments for forest conservation and helped support projects involving climate adaptation, Amerindian communities and sustainable development.
This was not simply an environmental exercise. It was an attempt to position Guyana strategically in a changing global economy and to establish that the country’s forests had economic value beyond the timber and other resources they contained.
That vision continues through the evolution of the Low Carbon Development Strategy into LCDS 2030.
One may disagree with particular policies or demand stronger accountability for their implementation. But a serious assessment of Jagdeo’s legacy cannot reasonably omit this contribution to Guyana’s international standing and development planning.
Housing: Turning land ownership into opportunity
Housing is another major part of the PPP/C’s development record. Successive administrations expanded residential development, distributed house lots, constructed supporting infrastructure and created opportunities for families to build homes.
The expansion of housing communities along the East Bank Demerara corridor, including the wider Eccles-Diamond development areas, illustrates how residential planning and transport infrastructure have increasingly become connected.
For an ordinary Guyanese family, access to land can mean the difference between a lifetime of renting and the opportunity to establish a permanent home.
House lots alone are not enough. Communities require proper roads, drainage, electricity, water and access to schools and healthcare. Those supporting investments must continue to keep pace with population growth.
Nevertheless, housing and land distribution have been important features of the PPP/C’s development programme, and they deserve recognition in any balanced assessment of the party’s record.
Education: Building human capital
Guyana’s development cannot be measured by bridges, highways and oil production alone. It must also be measured by whether children have access to education and whether young people can acquire the skills needed to participate in a modern economy.
Over successive administrations, public investment has supported school construction and rehabilitation, educational access, school feeding, student support and improvements to educational infrastructure.
The University of Guyana’s campuses at Turkeyen and Tain have served generations of students. More recent investments have expanded educational infrastructure across the country, including in hinterland communities.
The PPP/C’s education agenda has also included programmes intended to ease the financial burden on families and improve students’ access to learning materials and opportunities.
Of course, questions remain about school conditions, teacher availability, learning outcomes and the quality of educational delivery. Those questions must be addressed through better planning, monitoring and investment.
But it would be unreasonable to discuss Guyana’s development while ignoring the expansion of educational opportunities and the importance of continued investment in human capital.
Healthcare: Expanding the capacity to care for Guyanese
Healthcare development has also formed a major part of the national investment programme.
Guyana’s public health system has undergone successive programmes of hospital construction, rehabilitation, equipment upgrades and service expansion. More recent investments include new and modernised hospitals intended to improve access to medical services and reduce the burden on existing facilities.
The national healthcare challenge remains substantial. Guyana needs more trained professionals, stronger regional services, better patient management and improved access to specialist treatment.
However, the appropriate response is to identify deficiencies and strengthen the system, not to dismiss decades of investment.
A government’s record must include both what has been built and what remains to be done.
Infrastructure: The transformation is visible
One of the clearest ways to evaluate a development programme is to examine the physical infrastructure it leaves behind.
Under successive PPP/C administrations, Guyana has invested in roads, bridges, highways, drainage and irrigation, sea defences, water systems, airports and other public infrastructure.
The Berbice River Bridge improved connectivity between the eastern and western banks of the Berbice River. The Cheddi Jagan International Airport modernisation programme sought to strengthen Guyana’s international connectivity.
More recently, the infrastructure programme has expanded significantly.
Among the major projects completed or advanced in the current development period are:
The new Dr. Bharrat Jagdeo Demerara River Bridge is particularly significant. It provides a modern, four-lane crossing with a high clearance that allows vessels to pass while improving road connectivity between Regions Three and Four.
The bridge is expected to support commuters, commerce, construction, logistics and future industrial development. Its importance extends beyond the immediate reduction in travel delays: it strengthens the transport corridor linking communities and economic activity on both sides of the Demerara River.
Other major works include the Linden-Mabura Road project, the Palmyra-Moleson Creek highway corridor, the Soesdyke-Linden Highway programme and plans for a new Wismar-Mackenzie Bridge.
These projects should be judged on their cost, quality, delivery and long-term economic value. But their existence is a matter of public record.
They are part of a national infrastructural programme that aims to improve mobility, support investment and prepare Guyana for a larger and more diversified economy.