Skip to content

PPP/C’s record must be judged in full

Dear Editor,

Guyana is not Georgetown alone.

The development of hinterland and riverain communities must remain central to the national agenda. Access to schools, healthcare, clean water, reliable transport and economic opportunities should not depend on whether a citizen lives on the coast or in the interior.

The PPP/C has pursued programmes involving hinterland roads, community development, Amerindian land titling (a major achievement in my opinion), educational access, water supply and support for Indigenous communities.

The Community Service Officers programme and the Presidential Grants Programme have also formed part of efforts to support communities and local development.

In Region Seven, Region Nine and other interior regions, the need for improved access, stronger public services and reliable infrastructure remains clear. Progress must continue, and communities must have a meaningful voice in identifying their priorities.

I must say, however, that stronger public services have reached Region Seven with the recent commission of the Government Service Centre at 2nd Avenue, Bartica[1].

A credible development programme is one that brings the benefits of national growth to ordinary families, not only to major commercial centres.

The oil economy: opportunity must become lasting prosperity

The emergence of commercial oil production has transformed Guyana’s economic prospects.

But oil revenues alone do not guarantee prosperity. They must be converted into productive infrastructure, education, healthcare, housing, economic diversification and stronger national institutions.

The PPP/C administration has pursued a large programme of public investment, including transport infrastructure, energy development, housing, public facilities and social support.

The Gas-to-Energy project[2] is intended to expand electricity supply and reduce the cost of power generation. Its successful delivery and operation will be important to the competitiveness of Guyanese businesses and the long-term development of the economy.

The government has also continued to advance projects intended to improve connectivity, support agriculture and create opportunities for local businesses and contractors.

These investments must be accompanied by prudent fiscal management, transparent procurement, effective oversight and careful evaluation of public returns.

Guyana must avoid the mistakes made by resource-rich countries that accumulated wealth without building resilient economies or improving the lives of their citizens.

The PPP/C’s challenge is therefore not merely to spend more. It is to ensure that national wealth creates lasting value.

That is a legitimate standard for supporters and critics alike.

On the attack against Jagdeo’s political motives

Mohamed’s article attempts to interpret Jagdeo’s alleged engagement with APNU at a funeral wake as evidence of desperation and political fear.[3]

That conclusion goes beyond what the described encounter, on its own, can establish. Political leaders must be able to communicate across party lines. Dialogue between political opponents is not inherently evidence of weakness, nor does it necessarily indicate that a government fears electoral defeat.

Guyana has serious national issues that require engagement across political divisions.

Respectful communication, where appropriate, can be consistent with political maturity and a commitment to national interests.

A wake is a solemn occasion, and sensitivity toward the bereaved family must always take precedence. Any specific concern about conduct at the event should be assessed fairly and on the available evidence.

But an alleged conversation cannot, without further evidence, establish the existence of a secret political arrangement or prove that the PPP/C is facing imminent collapse.

The Vice President is entitled to have his public record assessed critically. He is also entitled to have that assessment conducted fairly. His policy decisions, economic arguments and contributions to national development should be examined on their merits rather than reduced to speculation about his personal motives.

Young Guyanese deserve history, not selective memory

Mohamed appeals to the younger generation and argues that young people are questioning established political loyalties.[4]

Young people should question authority. They should demand accountability, examine public expenditure and challenge political leaders of every affiliation.

But genuine political independence also requires historical understanding. Guyana’s present circumstances did not emerge in a vacuum. The country moved from a period of severe indebtedness and constrained public investment through years of economic reform, debt relief, infrastructure development and social investment before entering the oil era.

No single party or individual can claim exclusive credit for every improvement. Guyana’s workers, entrepreneurs, civil servants, farmers, teachers, healthcare professionals and successive administrations all contributed to the country’s development.

Yet the role played by successive PPP/C governments, including during Jagdeo’s presidency, deserves to be recognized honestly.

A generation that understands the past will be better equipped to demand more from the future.

The PPP/C’s record must be judged in full

The PPP/C is not entitled to govern indefinitely. No party is. But neither should any political movement be declared a failure through rhetoric that overlooks the country’s documented economic and infrastructural progress.

From the economic recovery and debt-relief process of the 1990s and early 2000s to the Low Carbon Development Strategy[5], housing expansion, public-service investment and the infrastructure programme of recent years, the PPP/C’s record contains substantial achievements worthy of examination.

The same record contains challenges that must be addressed. Both realities can be acknowledged without contradiction.

My support for the PPP/C is grounded in the view that its development agenda has helped shape modern Guyana and that its current programme offers significant opportunities to improve the lives of Guyanese. My support for Dr. Bharrat Jagdeo reflects my recognition of his role in the country’s economic and development history.

That support is not a demand for silence from critics. It is a demand for fairness, evidence and historical perspective.

Guyana’s future must be built through accountable leadership, sound economic management, investment in people and infrastructure, and institutions that serve every citizen.

The question is not whether Guyana has completed its development journey. It has not. The question is whether the country has moved a considerable distance from the economic circumstances it faced three decades ago and whether it now possesses opportunities that once seemed far beyond its reach.

The evidence of debt relief, income reclassification, infrastructure investment and the expansion of national development opportunities demonstrates the scale of that journey.

Let us debate the PPP/C’s record honestly. Let us demand accountability where it is warranted. But let us not erase the achievements that have helped move Guyana forward.

The future of Guyana belongs to all its people. It must be secured not through political hostility or selective memory, but through informed debate, responsible leadership and a commitment to turning national wealth into lasting prosperity.

Yours faithfully,
Dr. Josh Kanhai, MBBS, PGDip

References

  1. New Bartica Government Service Centre records 6,000 transactions to date – Department of Public Information, Guyanadpi.gov.gy ↩
  2. Gas-to-Energy project enters final phaseinewsguyana.com ↩
  3. Jagdeo’s overtures to APNU may represent revealing moment in Guyana’s political evolution ↩
  4. Political persecution of the Mohameds ↩
  5. Transforming Guyana’s Economy While Combating Climate Changeredd.unfccc.int ↩
Source